Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a score of 84.6 against 83.4. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.