Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than Galaxy A25 5G. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the older 13 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Motorola Edge 40 Pro feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit smaller display, a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and less brightness, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per display inch. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot higher video resolution and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.