Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A30's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.