Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a general score of 83.4 against 79.8. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, so it gives you some additional features. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a notably newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A30s, but it's heavier and thicker.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a higher screen pixel density and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A30s has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A30s features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.