Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A31, having an 83.4 score against 81.3. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A31, but it's a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a more MP back camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a lot higher video definition. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A31 has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.