Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a global score of 83.4 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer device than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but it's noticeably heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 53 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way higher video definition, a lot better resolution back camera and a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.