Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting an 86.6 score against 83.4. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A50s body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A50s has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a camera with more megapixels, a larger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.