Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a general score of 85.5 against 83.4. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an a lot older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is lighter and a little thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit lower screen density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture and a higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.