Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. The Galaxy A51 5G body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy A51 5G features a better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a lot better video definition, a back camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.