Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 overall score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy A52 5G's body is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it was released many years before.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.