Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a general score of 92.9 against 83.4. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have a display of the same size, the same count of pixels in each inch in the screen and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger sensor and a way better video quality. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.