Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. The Galaxy F41 is a incredibly older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter anyway.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F41 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy F41, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
Galaxy F41 counts with better battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.