Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. Galaxy F62 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it must be noted that it's also much older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the same number of pixels in each screen inch and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has much more screen brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4600mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.