Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although Motorola Edge 40 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy J7 Max features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 39 percent greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.