Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M20's overall score of 78.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Even though Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M20, it's a bit thinner and also a lot newer.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy M20 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.