Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a score of 84.1 against 83.4. Samsung Galaxy M21's construction is just a little lighter than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is just a little thicker and was released 3 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M21, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a lot brighter display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy M21 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M21, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy M21, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a more mega-pixels back camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy M21 counts with better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.