Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a score of 98.9 against 83.4. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System). Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's a bit heavier and was released 3 years before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.