Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5, with an 83.4 score against 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance tweaks. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is notably newer than Galaxy Note 5's, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less cores (but faster) and 8 GB less RAM. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much better video resolution, a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera, a way larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.