Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. Galaxy Note10 is an way older device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but Samsung could make it just a little thinner and lighter. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy Note10 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Note10 and Motorola Edge 40 Pro both have extremely similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher video quality. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 31% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.