Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, having an 83.4 score against 79.5. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Galaxy Note7 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.