Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 88.3 against 83.4. Galaxy S10's construction is a little thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Galaxy S10 features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy S10 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 35% more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger back camera sensor and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.