Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy S10 5G is an way older phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little less pixels per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.