Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 Lite is extremely older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite. They have a same size screen, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a lot higher video quality, a camera with more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.