Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. Although Galaxy S10e is notably older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is extremely lighter and a bit thinner. Galaxy S10e counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.