Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S20 is way older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 13 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. They have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S20 features more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has better video frame rates, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.