Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, even though it was released many years before. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a camera in the back with way more MP, a bigger camera sensor and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.