Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 overall score. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is notably older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. These phones use the same Android 13 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit less pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing way lower quality photographs and videos and worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.