Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 93.4 against 83.4. These phones come with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S22 has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S22 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a brighter screen and a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the same aperture and a camera with a 50 MP, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.