Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 83.4. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Even being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also older, a bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a way brighter display, a bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.