Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-04-04 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Interstellar Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25, getting a score of 83.4 against 82.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Galaxy S25's processing unit is very similar to Motorola Edge 40 Pro's processor, and although the Galaxy S25 has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a just a bit higher screen density. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 7680x4320 video definition, the same resolution back facing camera and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.