Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's overall score of 78.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. Although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier.
Galaxy S5 Plus has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.