Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a score of 83.4 against 77.8. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is notably newer and just a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.