Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-04-04 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Interstellar Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, with an 83.4 score against 80.9. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a sharper screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has improved battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 31% more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.