Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 83.4 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it is also just a bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and much darker screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less processing cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.