Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge, with a overall score of 83.4 against 78.1. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an older 13 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is much newer than Galaxy S7 edge's, although it's thicker and notably heavier.
Galaxy S7 edge features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a much worse pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.