Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a incredibly newer device, and it is also much lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better number of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back camera with lot more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.