Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is way newer, somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.