Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 88.5 against 83.4. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip is an notably older phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it's just a little lighter and thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a display of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a camera with lot more megapixels, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Edge 40 Pro have similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.