Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting an 85.6 score against 83.4. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is an older phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it just a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit lower pixels amount per screen inch, they both have a screen with the same size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.