Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it's noticeably heavier and was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, they have the same internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 2% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot higher video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.