Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's global score of 79. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is much newer and a lot thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is heavier.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and way more opaque display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.