Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a general score of 83.4 against 76. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the older 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little greater pixels density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4070mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light environments, a camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.