Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having an 87.9 score against 83.4. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, we must tell that it's also a notably older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the same quantity of pixels per inch of display and a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a brighter screen. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality images and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.