Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a general score of 83.4 against 78.2. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same screen brightness and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a quite better pixels density. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a way worse resolution back camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.