Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a global score of 91.5 against 83.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has older 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Even being the best device in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier device.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a display that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has less brightness, they both have the same display density, a same size display and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.