Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having a general score of 83.4 against 80.3. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, although it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back camera with more mega-pixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.