Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a score of 83.4 against 76.6. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction weights the same than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it is just a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, providing some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a back camera with a better resolution, a lot larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a much better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.