Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's overall score of 81.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same pixel density, a screen with the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.