Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 83.4 score against 79. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have the same display density, a display with the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much better video definition, a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.