Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having an 83.4 score against 83. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction weights the same than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but it is a little bit thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher video definition, a much larger sensor and a more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.